|
A more analogous case is that of the screwball
comedy, widely accepted by film historians as
constituting a "genre"—the screwball is defined not by a
fundamental attribute, but by a general disposition and
a group of elements, some (but rarely and perhaps never
all) of which are found in each of the genre's films.
%20-%201.jpg)
Criss Cross (1949)
%20-%202.jpg)
However, because of the diversity of noir (much greater
than that of the screwball comedy), certain scholars in
the field, such as film historian Thomas Schatz, treat
it as not a genre but a "style."
Alain Silver, the most
widely published American critic specializing in film
noir studies, refers to it as a "cycle" and a
"phenomenon," even as he argues that it has—like certain
genres—a consistent set of visual and thematic codes.
Other critics treat film noir as a "mood," a "movement,"
or a "series," or simply address a chosen set of movies
from the "period." There is no consensus on the matter.
Film noir - The prehistory of noir
|